commit d3fd203f36d46aa29600a72d57a1b61af80e4a25 upstream.
We got a syzkaller problem because of aarch64 alignment fault
if KFENCE enabled. When the size from user bpf program is an odd
number, like 399, 407, etc, it will cause the struct skb_shared_info's
unaligned access. As seen below:
BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free read in __skb_clone+0x23c/0x2a0 net/core/skbuff.c:1032
Use-after-free read at 0xffff6254fffac077 (in kfence-#213):
__lse_atomic_add arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h:26 [inline]
arch_atomic_add arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h:28 [inline]
arch_atomic_inc include/linux/atomic-arch-fallback.h:270 [inline]
atomic_inc include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:241 [inline]
__skb_clone+0x23c/0x2a0 net/core/skbuff.c:1032
skb_clone+0xf4/0x214 net/core/skbuff.c:1481
____bpf_clone_redirect net/core/filter.c:2433 [inline]
bpf_clone_redirect+0x78/0x1c0 net/core/filter.c:2420
bpf_prog_d3839dd9068ceb51+0x80/0x330
bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:728 [inline]
bpf_test_run+0x3c0/0x6c0 net/bpf/test_run.c:53
bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x638/0xa7c net/bpf/test_run.c:594
bpf_prog_test_run kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3148 [inline]
__do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4441 [inline]
__se_sys_bpf+0xad0/0x1634 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4381
kfence-#213: 0xffff6254fffac000-0xffff6254fffac196, size=407, cache=kmalloc-512
allocated by task 15074 on cpu 0 at 1342.585390s:
kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:568 [inline]
kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:675 [inline]
bpf_test_init.isra.0+0xac/0x290 net/bpf/test_run.c:191
bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x11c/0xa7c net/bpf/test_run.c:512
bpf_prog_test_run kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3148 [inline]
__do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4441 [inline]
__se_sys_bpf+0xad0/0x1634 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4381
__arm64_sys_bpf+0x50/0x60 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4381
To fix the problem, we adjust @size so that (@size + @hearoom) is a
multiple of SMP_CACHE_BYTES. So we make sure the struct skb_shared_info
is aligned to a cache line.
Fixes: 1cf1cae963 ("bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command")
Signed-off-by: Baisong Zhong <zhongbaisong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221102081620.1465154-1-zhongbaisong@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 6e6fddc78323533be570873abb728b7e0ba7e024 upstream.
sykzaller triggered several panics similar to the below:
[...]
[ 248.851531] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90
[ 248.857656] Read of size 985 at addr ffff8808017ffff2 by task a.out/1425
[...]
[ 248.865902] CPU: 1 PID: 1425 Comm: a.out Not tainted 4.18.0-rc4+ #13
[ 248.865903] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5039MS-H12TRF/X11SSE-F, BIOS 2.1a 03/08/2018
[ 248.865905] Call Trace:
[ 248.865910] dump_stack+0xd6/0x185
[ 248.865911] ? show_regs_print_info+0xb/0xb
[ 248.865913] ? printk+0x9c/0xc3
[ 248.865915] ? kmsg_dump_rewind_nolock+0xe4/0xe4
[ 248.865919] print_address_description+0x6f/0x270
[ 248.865920] kasan_report+0x25b/0x380
[ 248.865922] ? _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90
[ 248.865924] check_memory_region+0x137/0x190
[ 248.865925] kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
[ 248.865927] _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90
[ 248.865930] bpf_test_finish.isra.8+0x4f/0xc0
[ 248.865932] bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x6a0/0xba0
[...]
After scrubbing the BPF prog a bit from the noise, turns out it called
bpf_skb_change_head() for the lwt_xmit prog with headroom of 2. Nothing
wrong in that, however, this was run with repeat >> 0 in bpf_prog_test_run_skb()
and the same skb thus keeps changing until the pskb_expand_head() called
from skb_cow() keeps bailing out in atomic alloc context with -ENOMEM.
So upon return we'll basically have 0 headroom left yet blindly do the
__skb_push() of 14 bytes and keep copying data from there in bpf_test_finish()
out of bounds. Fix to check if we have enough headroom and if pskb_expand_head()
fails, bail out with error.
Another bug independent of this fix (but related in triggering above) is
that BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN should be reworked to reset the skb/xdp buffer to
it's original state from input as otherwise repeating the same test in a
loop won't work for benchmarking when underlying input buffer is getting
changed by the prog each time and reused for the next run leading to
unexpected results.
Fixes: 1cf1cae963 ("bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command")
Reported-by: syzbot+709412e651e55ed96498@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+54f39d6ab58f39720a55@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
[connoro: drop test_verifier.c changes not applicable to 4.14]
Signed-off-by: Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Make sure we apply NET_IP_ALIGN when reserving headroom for SKB
and XDP test runs, just like a real driver would.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Instead, pass the kattr in which has a kernel side copy of this
data structure from userspace already.
Fix based upon a suggestion from Alexei Starovoitov.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
development and testing of networking bpf programs is quite cumbersome.
Despite availability of user space bpf interpreters the kernel is
the ultimate authority and execution environment.
Current test frameworks for TC include creation of netns, veth,
qdiscs and use of various packet generators just to test functionality
of a bpf program. XDP testing is even more complicated, since
qemu needs to be started with gro/gso disabled and precise queue
configuration, transferring of xdp program from host into guest,
attaching to virtio/eth0 and generating traffic from the host
while capturing the results from the guest.
Moreover analyzing performance bottlenecks in XDP program is
impossible in virtio environment, since cost of running the program
is tiny comparing to the overhead of virtio packet processing,
so performance testing can only be done on physical nic
with another server generating traffic.
Furthermore ongoing changes to user space control plane of production
applications cannot be run on the test servers leaving bpf programs
stubbed out for testing.
Last but not least, the upstream llvm changes are validated by the bpf
backend testsuite which has no ability to test the code generated.
To improve this situation introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command
to test and performance benchmark bpf programs.
Joint work with Daniel Borkmann.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
